Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Business Texts and Cases Chapter 34 Employment Discrimination


Chapter 34


Employment Discrimination




TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS

A1.      An employer’s discrimination against job applicants or employees on certain bases may violate both federal and state laws.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     696                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B1.      An employer with fewer than fifteen employees is automatically shielded from federal employment discrimination laws.

            answer:    F                              PAGE:     696                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A2.      The Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not prohibit job discrimination on the basis of experience.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     696                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B2.      All employers in the United States are subject to federal employment discrimination laws.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     696                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A3.      A victim of alleged discrimination must bring a suit against an employer before filing a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

            answer:    F                              PAGE:     698                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B3.      To establish a prima facie case of discrimina­tion under Title VII, a plain­tiff must show that discriminatory intent motivated an em­ployer’s decision.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     698                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A4.      To bring an action against an employer based on intentional dis­crimina­tion, a person must show that he or she is a mem­ber of a protected class.

            answer:    T                              PAGE:     698                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B4.      Lack of discriminatory intent is a complete defense to a charge of unlawful employment discrimination.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     699                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A5.      Job requirements that relate to job performance cannot violate employment discrimination laws.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     699                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal



B5.      Disparate-impact discrimination occurs when an employer intention­ally discrim­inates against an employee who is a member of a protected class.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     699                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A6.      If an employee can prove discrimination in the formation or enforcement of an employment contract, he or she may obtain a larger damages award.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B6.      Under the Equal Pay Act of 1963, all of the women on an employer’s staff must be paid the same as all of the men.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A7.      Gender can be a determining factor in an employer’s decision to hire, fire, or promote an employee.

            answer:    F                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B7.      An employer is not liable for the sexual harassment of an employee by the employee’s supervisor.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     702                          TYPE:      +
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A8.      A small difference in job content can justify higher pay for one gender.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B8.      It is not unlawful for an employer to retaliate against an employee who has opposed a discriminatory employment practice.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     702                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A9.      An employer is not liable for the sexual harassment of an employee by a co-worker who is not the employee’s supervisor.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     704                          TYPE:      +
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B9.      An employer can be liable for an employee’s sexual harassment of a member of the same gender.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     704                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A10.    Title VII does not cover employees’ online activities.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Technology               AICPA Legal

B10.    Compensatory damages are only available for victims of in­tentional employment dis­crimination.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A11.    Damages are available for victims of in­tentional employment dis­crimi­nation based on gender, religion, age, or disability.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B11.    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits employ­ment discrimi­nation on the basis of age against persons over twenty-one years old.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A12.    The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 defines disabled persons as persons impaired mentally or physically “in any way.”

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B12.    To establish a prima facie case of discrimina­tion under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a plaintiff must show that dis­criminatory in­tent motivated an employer’s decision.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     706                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A13.    Many of the same remedies available under Title VII are available under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B13.    An employer must hire a dis­abled applicant even if he or she lacks neces­sary job qualifications.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     709                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A14.    Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, disabled employees are entitled to “reasonable accommodation.”

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     711                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B14.    Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a person with a physi­cal impairment that “substantially limits” everyday activities is disabled.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A15.    Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, disabled job appli­cants are not entitled to “reasonable accommodation.”

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     711                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B15.    Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a person with a men­tal impairment that “substantially limits” everyday activities is not disabled.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A16.    An employer must modify its job-application process so that those with disabilities can compete for jobs with those who do not have disabilities.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     711                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B16.    Terminating an employee who uses drugs violates the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     712                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A17.    A good business reason for a practice that has a discriminatory effect may permit an employer to avoid liability for discrimination.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     712                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B17.    An em­ployer who hires and fires workers ac­cording to a fair seniority sys­tem may have a good defense to an employment discrimination suit.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     713                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A18.    Race can be a bona fide occupational qualification.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     712                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B18.    An employer who discovers an employee’s misconduct after discharging the employee may have a good defense to an employment discrimination suit.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     713                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A19.    Under current law, an employer cannot adopt an affirmative action plan.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     713                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B19.    Under current law, an employer cannot adopt an affirmative action plan.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     713                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

A20.    After-acquired evidence of an employee’s wrongdoing can shield an employer entirely from liability for employment discrimination.

            ANSWER:    F                              PAGE:     713                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B20.    At least one court has held that an affirmative action program violated the U.S. Constitution.

            ANSWER:    T                              PAGE:     714                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal




MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

A1.      Personnel Staffing Corporation meets all of the requirements to be subject to the federal employment discrimination laws. Among these, the most important statute prohibiting discrimination against members of protected classes is

a.         the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.
b.         the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
c.         the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978.
d.         Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

            ANSWER:    D                        PAGE:           696                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B1.      Hu believes that he is a victim of a form of employment discrimination that falls under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Compliance with this statute is monitored by

a.         employees and job applicants, not an administrative agency.
b.         employers and businesses, not an administrative agency.
c.         the courts and Congress, not an administrative agency.
d.         the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission.

            ANSWER:    D                        PAGE:           698                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A2.      Jake is a U.S. citizen working abroad for Kettle Corporation, which is a U.S. firm. Jake is protected by U.S. employment discrimination laws only if

a.         Jake also works in the United States.
b.         Kettle agrees to comply.
c.         there is no such law in the country in which Jake works.
d.         this does not violate the law of the country in which Jake works.

            ANSWER:    D                        PAGE:           696                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B2.      Lew, a member of a protected class, applies for a job with Mit-E Construction Company, but fails Mit-E’s employment test and is not hired. Lew believes that the test has an unintentionally discriminatory effect. If so, this is

a.         desperate-measure discrimination.
b.         disparate-impact discrimination.
c.         disparate-treatment discrimination.
d.         not discrimination.

            ANSWER:    B                        PAGE:           699                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A3.      Lee is seventy years old and Mira is gay. Based on this information, members of protected classes include

a.         Lee and Mira.
b.         Lee only.
c.         Mira only.
d.         neither Lee nor Mira.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     696                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal


B3.      Riki files an employment, gender-based discrimination suit against Superior Corporation under Title VII, on a disparate-impact theory. To succeed, Riki must show that Superior hires fewer women than the per­centage of

a.         qualified women in the local labor market.
b.         qualified women in the United States.
c.         women in Superior’s state.
d.         women who apply to Imperial for work.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     699                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A4.      Cody believes that Delta Corporation has dis­criminated against him on the basis of gender. Cody files a suit against Delta under Title VII. To es­tablish a prima facie case of employment discrimi­nation, Cody must show that

a.         Cody is a member of a protected class.
b.         Delta has no legal defenses against the claim.
c.         discriminatory intent motivated Delta’s act.
d.         other firms in Delta’s industry have committed discriminatory acts.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     698                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B4.      Gail is an employee of Home Appliances, Inc., but is un­able to perform her job because of her pregnancy. Gail is

a.         entitled to disability leave only if Home treats other temporarily dis­abled employees similarly.
b.         entitled to disability leave under any circumstances.
c.         not entitled to disability leave because she cannot perform her job.
d.         not entitled to disability leave under any circumstances.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A5.      Olly applies for a job with Petro Company. Petro does not hire Olly because of his ethnicity, or national origin. This is

a.         desperate-measure discrimination.
b.         disparate-impact discrimination.
c.         disparate-treatment discrimination.
d.         not discrimination.

            ANSWER:    C                        PAGE:           698                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B5.      Research Statistics Corporation uses a merit system to pay its employees according to their job performance. Suki, a female, and Troy, a male, are Research employees with comparable jobs. Due to superior performance, Suki is paid more than Troy. This is

a.         disparate-impact discrimination.
b.         gender discrimination.
c.         not discrimination.
d.         reverse discrimination.

            ANSWER:    C                        PAGE:           700                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

Fact Pattern 34-1A (Questions A6-A7 apply)
Fay works for General Construction Contractors (GCC) but is the only woman on her shift. The male workers often play minor pranks on each other. Fay at­tempts a prank. Hank, her supervisor, fires her, because “GCC doesn’t hold with pranks.”

A6.      Refer to Fact Pattern 34-1A. Fay files a suit against GCC under Title VII. To succeed, Fay must show that Hank’s statement was

            a.         a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for Fay’s discharge.
            b.         also Fay’s feeling about pranks at GCC.
            c.         only a pretext for Fay’s dis­charge.
            d.         unofficial GCC policy.

            answer:    C                              PAGE:     698                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal


B6.      United Industrial Corporation gives preferential treatment in hiring and promotion to the members of all protected classes. This treatment results in discrimination against members of the majority. This is

a.         a bona fide occupational practice.
b.         a business necessity.
c.         constructive discharge.
d.         reverse discrimination.

ANSWER:    D                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

Fact Pattern 34-1A (Questions A6-A7 apply)
Fay works for General Construction Contractors (GCC) but is the only woman on her shift. The male workers often play minor pranks on each other. Fay at­tempts a prank. Hank, her supervisor, fires her, because “GCC doesn’t hold with pranks.”

A7.      Refer to Fact Pattern 34-1A. To successfully defend itself in Fay’s suit, GCC must show that Hank’s statement was

            a.         a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for Fay’s discharge.
            b.         not Fay’s feeling about pranks at GCC.
            c.         only a pretext for Fay’s dis­charge.
            d.         unofficial GCC policy.

            ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     698                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B7.      Rona is Stu’s administrative assistant and both work for TriCounty Labor Inc. Stu tells Rona that for sexual favors, he will give her an excellent performance review and recommend a raise. This is

a.         harassment on the basis of sexual orientation.
b.         hostile-environment harassment.
c.         not harassment.
d.         quid pro quo harassment.

            ANSWER:    D                        PAGE:           701                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A8.      Lloyd and Milly are employees of NuTech Corporation. They have the same job. Under the Equal Pay Act, NuTech can legitimately pay Lloyd more than Milly on the basis of

a.         Lloyd’s greater production only.
b.         Lloyd’s greater production or seniority.
c.         Lloyd’s greater seniority only.
d.         neither Lloyd’s greater production nor his greater seniority.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     700                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

Fact Pattern 34-1B (Questions B8–B9 apply)
Kit, manager of Long-Term Care Company’s office in Metro City, de­cides to replace the office’s male employees with females. Nia, an assis­tant manager transferred from a different Long-Term Care office, refuses to cooperate. Kit retali­ates against Nia, who quits. Within a year, the male employees also quit.

B8.      Refer to Fact Pattern 34-1B. Kit’s conduct is most likely a violation of

a.         no law.
b.         the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
c.         the Americans with Disabilities Act.
d.         Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

ANSWER:    D                              PAGE:     701                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A9.      Greta is the only female employee in the maintenance department of Hydraulics Inc. Greta’s supervisor and co-workers tease and play tricks on her so relentlessly that she feels compelled to quit. This is

a.         a constructive discharge on the basis of gender discrimination.
b.         a harassing discharge on the basis of treatment discrimination.
c.         a voluntary discharge on the basis of impact discrimination.
d.         not a discharge or discrimination.

            ANSWER:    A                        PAGE:           701                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

Fact Pattern 34-1B (Questions B8–B9 apply)
Kit, manager of Long-Term Care Company’s office in Metro City, de­cides to replace the office’s male employees with females. Nia, an assis­tant manager transferred from a different Long-Term Care office, refuses to cooperate. Kit retali­ates against Nia, who quits. Within a year, the male employees also quit.

B9.      Refer to Fact Pattern 34-1B. Liability for Kit’s conduct most likely rests with

a.         Long-Term Care male employees, who should have acted themselves.
b.         Long-Term Care, which should have known, and Kit, who acted.
c.         Nia, who did not cooperate.
d.         no one, because no law was violated.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     701                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A10.    Fix-It Repair Shop does not take any action to prevent sexual harassment of its employees. Fix-It Repair may be liable for such harassment by

a.         a customer only.
b.         a customer or an employee.
c.         an employee only.
d.         not a customer or an employee.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     704                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B10.    Marie, an employee of Nickel Tool Company, files a sexual-harassment suit against Owen, her supervisor. Marie wins. Nickel may also be liable if it had effective harassment policies and complaint procedures, and

a.         Marie failed to follow them.
b.         Marie followed them.
c.         Owen failed to follow them.
d.         Owen followed them.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     702                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A11.    Kyla is a salesperson for Liberty Financial Corporation. Micky is also a Liberty salesperson. Neil is Kyla and Micky’s supervisor. Owen is a Liberty customer. Liberty may be li­able for sexual harassment to Kyla by

a.         Micky only.
b.         Micky, Neil, or Owen.
c.         Micky or Neil only.
d.         Neil only.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     704                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B11.    Svetlana, a fifty-five-year-old member of a racial minority with a disability, believes that she is a victim of employment discrimination. Potentially the most widespread form of discrimination is based on

a.         age.
b.         disability.
c.         gender.
d.         race.

            ANSWER:    A                        PAGE:           705                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A12.    Cora, a female, and Dom, a male, are employees of Equipment Leasing Corporation. Cora regularly e-mails sexually explicit images to Dom via Equipment Leasing’s computer network. Dom finds this offensive. This is

a.         hostile-environment harassment.
b.         not harassment or any form of discrimination.
c.         quid pro quo harassment.
d.         reverse discrimination.

            ANSWER:    A                        PAGE:           705                          TYPE:      N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal
           
B12.    Mold & Dye Corporation is a private employer in­volved in a Title VII employment discrimination suit. Punitive damages may be recovered against Mold & Dye only if the employer

a.         acted with malice or reckless indifference.
b.         can easily afford to pay the amount.
c.         has one hundred or more employees.
d.         none of the choices.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A13.    Mona files an employment discrimination suit against Nationwide Corporation (NC) under Title VII. If Mona shows that NC acted with malice or reckless indifference, she may recover

a.         compensatory damages only.
b.         compensatory or punitive damages.
c.         neither compensatory nor punitive damages.
d.         punitive damages only.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

Fact Pattern 34-2B (Questions B13–B14 apply)
Lita replaces Manny in his job at Neighborly Business Corporation (NBC).

B13.    Refer to Fact Pattern 34-2B. Manny believes that he has been discriminated against on the basis of his age. For the Age Dis­crimination in Employment Act of 1967 to apply

a.         all parties must be forty years of age or younger.
b.         Lita must be forty years of age or older.
c.         Manny must be forty years of age or older.
d.         NBC must have been in existence for at least forty years.

ANSWER:    C                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A14.    Piku files an employment discrimination suit against Quotient Accounting, Inc., under Title VII, based on its discharge of Piku. In these circum­stances, possible relief under Title VII includes

            a.         damages only.
            b.         damages or job reinstatement.
            c.         job reinstatement only.
            d.         neither damages or job reinstatement.

            answer:    B                              PAGE:     705                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal


Fact Pattern 34-2B (Questions B13–B14 apply)
Lita replaces Manny in his job at Neighborly Business Corporation (NBC).

B14.    Refer to Fact Pattern 34-2B. To succeed with an age-discrimination claim against CBC, Manny will have to show that

a.         Lita is not qualified for Manny’s job.
b.         Manny is qualified for his job.
c.         NBC’s qualifications for Manny’s job are too high.
d.         no one could do Manny’s job as well as he could.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     706                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A15.    United Company replaces Vera, a forty-five-year-old employee, with Wendy. Vera files a suit against United under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. To establish a prima facie case, Vera must show, among other things, that she is

a.         deserving of higher pay than Wendy.
b.         generally more dependable than Wendy.
c.         older than Wendy.
d.         qualified for the position.

ANSWER:    D                              PAGE:     706                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B15.    Dan has AIDS, Eve is blind, and both work for First National Bank. Con­sidered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act

a.         are Dan and Eve.
b.         is Dan only.
c.         is Eve only.
d.         is neither Dan nor Eve.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A16.    Hi-Flite Corporation requires its pilots to have 20/20 vision without glasses. Neither Inez, an African-American female, nor Jock, a fifty-year-old male, can satisfy this requirement. Relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act is available to

a.         Inez and Jock.
b.         Inez only.
c.         Jock only.
d.         neither Inez nor Jock.

ANSWER:    D                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B16.    Dick is easily embarrassed, Elin is easily sunburned, and both work for First City Bank. Considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act

a.         are Dick and Elin.
b.         is Dick only.
c.         is Elin only.
d.         is neither Dick nor Elin.

ANSWER:    D                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

Fact Pattern 34-2A (Questions A17–A18 apply)
Beth, who has a disability, is an employee of Corporate Office Company (COC). After the installation of new doors on COC’s building, Beth finds it nearly im­possible to get in and out. For repeatedly failing to be on time, COC replaces Beth with Dian, who does not have a disability.

A17.    Refer to Fact Pattern 34-2A.  To succeed with a claim against COC under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Beth will have to show that

a.         Beth consistently met the essential requirements of her job.
b.         COC refused to make reasonable accommodation for Beth.
c.         Dian is unqualified for Beth’s position.
d.         the doors were installed as an act of intentional discrimination.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     711                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal


Fact Pattern 34-2A (Questions A17–A18 apply)
Beth, who has a disability, is an employee of Corporate Office Company (COC). After the installation of new doors on COC’s building, Beth finds it nearly im­possible to get in and out. For repeatedly failing to be on time, COC replaces Beth with Dian, who does not have a disability.

B17.    Paolo has cerebral palsy, Quincy has kleptomania, and both work for Reality Insurance Company. Considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act

a.         are Paolo and Quincy.
b.         is Paolo only.
c.         is Quincy only.
d.         is neither Paolo nor Quincy.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     710                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A18.    Refer to Fact Pattern 34-2A.  To successfully defend against Beth’s claim, COC will have to show that

a.         Beth consistently failed to meet the essential requirements of her job.
b.         COC cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship.
c.         Dian is qualified for Beth’s position.
d.         the doors were not installed as an act of intentional discrimination.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     711                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B18.    Flynn is an alcoholic. Gert is morbidly obese. Both work for Helpful Credit Company. Considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act

a.         are Flynn and Gert.
b.         is Flynn only.
c.         is Gert only.
d.         is neither Flynn nor Gert.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     712                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A19.    Sophisticates, a women’s clothing store, employs female attendants to as­sist customers in the dressing rooms. Tod, a forty-one-year-old male, ap­plies for an atten­dant’s job, but is not hired. In Tod’s suit against Sophisticates for em­ployment discrimination under Title VII, the store has

a.         an after-acquired evidence defense.
b.         a bona fide occupational qualification defense.
c.         a business necessity defense.
d.         a seniority systems defense.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     712                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

B19.    Machine Corporation requires its employees to have a high school diploma, claiming a definite connection between a high school edu­ca­tion and job performance. In a suit against Machine Corporation under Title VII, this requirement is shown to have a discriminatory effect. The employer has

a.         an affirmative action defense.
b.         a bona fide occupational qualification defense.
c.         a business necessity defense.
d.         no defense.

ANSWER:    C                              PAGE:     712                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal

A20.    Eton sues Funds Investment Company for employment discrimina­tion under a state law. When compared to federal law, state law may provide

a.         less damages only.
b.         more damages.
c.         no damages.
d.         the same damages only.

ANSWER:    B                              PAGE:     715                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Analytic                     AICPA Legal

B20.    Chris sues Delta, Inc., for employment discrimina­tion under a state law. When compared to federal law, state law may apply to firms with

a.         fewer employees.
b.         more employees only.
c.         no employees.
d.         the same number of employees only.

ANSWER:    A                              PAGE:     715                          TYPE:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Legal



Essay Questions

A1.      With a couple of new ideas regarding software design, Carol and Ray start a partnership that, with business success, becomes Pacific Applications Company. The company grows to include a staff of twenty-one employees. Over time, Pacific develops a new computer operating sys­tem. The firm signs licensing contracts with several computer manu­fac­turers, but needs to double the number of its employees to fulfill those con­tracts. Is Pacific subject to federal antidiscrimination laws? If so, what should it consider in hiring new employees?

            ANSWER:    Pacific is subject to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, each of which applies to employers affecting interstate commerce and having fifteen or more em­ployees. Pacific is also subject to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which applies to employers with twenty or more employees. Under these laws, in hiring new employees, Pacific cannot discriminate against any applicant on the basis of race, religion, national origin, gen­der, age, or disability. A class of persons defined by one or more of these criteria is a protected class. Generally, Pacific's work force should reflect the diversity of the community in which Pacific is located. Pacific may ex­clude members of protected classes who are qualified applicants only if it has a reason that is genuinely related to an important job interest and only if no reasonable accommodation is possible. For most positions, such a claim would be hard to substantiate.

PAGES:         696–698, 705–709 & 710–711                              type:      =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Decision Modeling

B1.  For twenty years, Ozzie works for Players Paradise, a destination for vacationers from across the United States, maintaining golf carts. After a steady stream of positive job evaluations and merit pay raises, Ozzie is promoted to the position of supervisor of golf-cart maintenance at three of Players’s courses. Five years later, a new employee, Quentin, is hired to oversee operations at all ten of Players’s courses. Quentin demotes Ozzie, who is now over the age of forty, to running only one of the three cart facilities, and freezes his salary. Quentin demotes five other employees over the age of forty and places one of Ozzie’s former facilities under the supervision of Richie, who is twenty-three. Ozzie overhears Richie say, “We’re going to have to do away with these old, senile men.” Less than a year later, Quentin reconsolidates the three cart facilities’ operations under Richie’s charge. Ozzie quits and files a suit against Players for employment discrimination.  Should he prevail?  Explain.

            ANSWER:    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits discrimination in em­ployment on the basis of age against individuals forty years of age or older.  For the ADEA to apply, an employer must have twenty or more employees, and interstate com­merce must be affected by the employer’s business activi­ties. Ozzie worked at Players Paradise, which with ten golf courses most likely employed more than twenty persons. The court would also probably find that Players’s activities affected inter­state commerce because it is a vacation destination with visitors from many states. Ozzie could likely establish the rest of a prima facie case. Because Ozzie was not demoted due to any apparent job-performance prob­lems, the fact that he was replaced by a person approximately half his age, coupled with Richie’s state­ment about get­ting rid of all the “old, senile men,” would be enough to shift the burden to Players to show that it was not discriminating on the basis of age. Ultimately, based on the facts in the question, Ozzie would probably prevail.

PAGES:         705–709                    type:   N
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Decision Modeling

A2.      Beth, managing editor of the City News, has a lenient policy concerning employee tardiness. She would prefer that employees be to work by 9 a.m., but does not usually enforce this policy. One week, Don, who had spent the previous month in an alcohol-abuse rehabilitation program, was late three days in a row. Given his appearance, it was obvious that he had been drinking. Can Beth suspend him without pay for two weeks?

            ANSWER:    Probably not. Under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers cannot legally discriminate against employees who are alcoholics. Alcoholism is considered a disability. If Don can prove that be­cause of his alcoholism, he was disciplined more harshly than his col­leagues would have been under similar circumstances (arriving late without providing an excuse), as would appear to be the case when a late­ness policy is not usually enforced, the ADA would protect him from the effects of that discipline.

PAGES:         712                             type:   =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Decision Modeling

B2.      Sara is a repairperson for Telecommunications Company (TC). The job requires driving to remote areas to make repairs under any conditions.  Sara has had the job longer than other employees. Sara applies for a promotion to a supervisory position that requires constant communica­tion with others in the field. TC rejects the application on the ground that Sara is hearing impaired. TC acknowledges that Sara is otherwise quali­fied, but asserts that it “needs someone who does not have a hear­ing dis­ability.” Sara files a suit against TC under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. What is the issue in this problem, and what are the relevant considerations on which its resolution depends?

            ANSWER:    The issue is whether hiring a sign interpreter is a reason­able accommodation for an employee or an undue hardship for the em­ployer.  The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employers from refusing to hire (or promote) disabled persons who are otherwise qualified for a particular position.  An em­ployer may have to make rea­sonable accommodations for a disabled appli­cant, but that will not cause the applicant to be con­sidered unqualified.  Reasonable accommodations might include creating new job as­signments, and creating or improving training ma­terials and procedures.  Employers who do not wish to make such accommoda­tions must demonstrate that the accommoda­tions will cause “undue hardship.”  The law offers no uniform standards for identi­fying what is an undue hardship, but there are limits to the employer’s obligation to accommo­date an employee under the ADA.  Accommodation cannot impose a “significant diffi­culty or ex­pense” on the employer.  Also, if a disabled employee can perform the essen­tials of his or her job with­out accommodation, then no violation of the ADA has oc­curred. Besides hir­ing a sign inter­preter to accompany a deaf employee, in some cases a com­pany could train an employee’s co-workers in American Sign Language.  The basics of sign language can be learned in just a few hours, so the expense to the company would be minimal.

PAGE:           711                             type:   =
                        NAT: AACSB Reflective                                                   AICPA Decision Modeling

No comments:

Post a Comment